Benjamin Franklin’s famous quote claims two things are inevitable – death and taxes. For those in the AFC or compliance field, you can add regulatory change as a third certainty, and a regulatory environment already known for complexity will – in the short term at least – continue to prove challenging.
Understanding the potential impact of forthcoming regulatory change is critical when preparing for the future, and this keynote panel session will consider:
The use of machine learning by financial institutions in the fight against financial crime can bring advantages from many perspectives, but to fulfil all regulatory obligations within that context can be challenging.
This keynote case study will demonstrate an approach to use machine learning within Transaction Monitoring in a compliant way, whilst discussing the challenges which had to be solved before successful implementation.
Sanctions adherence is an ongoing challenge to financial institutions, with new sanctions packages being released at seemingly shorter and shorter intervals and ever-more complex rules being introduced. Adherence to sanctions packages is mandatory and must be implemented immediately, and often requires significant investment of time and effort to do achieve.
This think tank will consider how gathering the right data at the initial onboarding stage, and focusing on due diligence processes, can be critical in ongoing sanctions adherence and how this impacts you onboarding processes – whether remote or in person.
Any regulated entity in the financial space is expected to use technology to improve their financial crime detection rates. Regulators require investment in this field to demonstrate full adherence with their AFC regulations, whilst from an operational perspective, the use of technology can provides an opportunity to automate tasks, provide more certain outcomes and help ensure human activity is focused on the area it can make the greatest difference.
However, for many, onboarding third-party technology can be a lengthy and expensive exercise, and for fintechs and other start-ups, there may be the complication of unique requirements which need bespoke technology to limit their financial crime risks – meaning a self-built tool can be a preferred option. At the other end of the scale, many major financial institutions have their own innovation groups, thus providing access to talented coders and technology creators – also opening up the opportunity to create tools which are specifically targeted towards and unique use case.
This session will consider the relative value of using internal expertise to create anti-financial crime technology specific to your business vs. working with an external solution provider. What are the ideal conditions to create your own technology and what challenges/risks does this bring to your organisation?
With the EU’s 14th sanctions recently implemented, and further changes from the EU, UK and US bring brought in on a regular basis, the role of those managing sanctions exposure has never been more important.
UBO checks are a vital way to ensure adherence to money laundering regulations. However, in this fast-changing environment, there are key challenges to overcome to ensure your UBO approach meets all the relevant regulatory requirements, and this critical discussion will focus on:
Expectations of immediate digital customer onboarding are now the norm in the financial sector across Europe. An approach once limited to fintechs and neobanks has now spread across all types of financial institution, and any consumer-focused institution who doesn’t offer this will quickly be left behind.
However, as criminals now have easy access to technology to create deepfake videos, voice cloning and other forms of identify masking, their ability to overcome automated KYC checks creates a new level of risk for those fighting financial crime. This panel discussion will delve into how to counter this, by focusing on the following areas:
AML and Fraud-based Regulatory requires are a critical aspect of compliance within financial institutions. Maintaining adherence to these is, of course, vital, and the risks of not doing so are huge – a challenge which is heightened by the ever-increasing number of regulations which must be adhered to and the ever-increasing pace of regulatory change.
However, in a risk-based regulatory environment, the risk appetite of individual firms informs their approach to adherence, and safety is often the best policy - often to leading to conservative approaches. However, this can potentially lead to unintended consequences; both business-based (i.e. hindering business growth opportunities), through to social challenges where those at most risk have the potential be excluded from the financial systems and the help they need.
In this one-on-one interview, Dr Firas Habach will explore how to find the right level of balance when considering this critical issue, whilst also considering where new technologies and developments in the fields of crypto and like might provide different and interesting challenges to overcome here.
Join our champagne round tables for an open discussion on some of the critical technology-based topics impacting the world of FCC leaders in the EU today